In the latter part of 1837, Charles Dickens published the first portion of a book that he would finish piece-by-piece in a magazine. He was twenty-five the year he ended each successive part on a cliffhanger. His audience waited, often jittery through half-contained excitement for the next issue. Bit-by-bit he orchestrated a novel whose last words greeted public eyes in 1838. They later compiled the book into the single volume we know as Oliver Twist. Commoners could afford the weekly installments while the aristocracy enjoyed complete volumes.
Sixty-four years after Oliver, Georges Méliès complimented his career as an illusionist with Le Voyage Dans La Lune. The innovation of Trip to the Moon shattered the time-boundary of two-minute shorts with its then stunning fourteen-minute runtime and later inspired Selznick to sketch Hugo. Granted, moving pictures eventually added enough film to keep an audience seated for a couple of hours plus intermission but there was enough room on the screen for short films all the way through Chaplin’s era. People paid a cheap price for several shorter films and then talked about them over ice-cream at the nearest diner. With the rise of the television, however, short films tapered off. Rising ticket prices made it unfeasible to go to short films. The industry exiled small-budget directors to festivals and college film classes. Feature films made the money. Good news for the average joe, bad for the struggling screenwriter.
In the late fifties, the paperback revolution made it cheap and easy to buy a full novel. Why pay for shorts or serials when you can get the whole thing for a dollar? Book production skyrocketed, despite the hollow warning from Publisher’s Weekly. The serial novel fell into… well… novelty. No, more than a novelty. Serials became a thing for antique road shows and pawn stars to get their grubby paws on. Good for the common man, bad for the struggling author.
Much later, YouTube entered the scene and threatened the success of America’s Funniest Home Videos and Total Request Live with viral short-shorts and music videos. People earned revenue from such things, but so what? People have always made money from exceptions like game shows and state lotteries.
Meanwhile, a little Internet startup purchased the French e-book company Mobipocket and used the company to introduce an e-Reader named “the Kindle.” They started selling digital books in addition to their already robust print market. Authors began making money from self-published books, but so what? People have always made money as self-backed artists and off of their hobbies. They’re the exception to the rule.
The National Film Festival started seeing more and more of their shorts on YouTube. Some rumored Pit Bull and JLo to have cashed more money off the YouTube version of On the Floor than the actual revenue from the song. At 500 Million hits, who could argue with that? Content creation now lives or dies inside the precious first ninety seconds and if your movie clocks in under fifteen minutes, you can even post it for free. Even Le Voyage Dans La Lune makes that cut, long as it was for its time. Keep an eye out for a coming surge in short film production because it’s once more financially feasible.
At the same time, Amazon released Kindle shorts – novellas, short stories and episodes for cheap. I’m noticing more episodes in the Kindle shorts market and wonder if we’re moving toward a culture of short films and serial novels, a deep culture that spends less time soaking up absurd amounts of information and more time processing the little information we do gather. People seem to discuss more, reflect more than twenty years ago. This got me thinking…
If every agent in my genre(s) rejected my novel, I’d take a page out of Charley’s book at this point. The potential of serials finally persuaded me toward self-publishing. Either that, or I got tired of fighting the onslaught of “come on, everyone’s doing it.” I like to think I chose this path because of the former.
For you regulars, here’s what it might look like:
- Episode One: FREE
- Episode Two: $0.99
- Episode Three: $1.19
- Episode Four: $1.39
- Episode Five: $1.59
- Episode Six: $1.79
- Episode Seven: $0.99
That way if someone wants to bail at any point, they can save their money. It’s free to catch the first glimpse of the world, but it builds value over time. I think Gergia’s worth more than a buck, but I don’t want to break any of you in the long run, so I’d drop the price back down for the ending. You’re faced with an option that way – keep up to date and discuss what’s going on the day it comes out, or wait a year for it. If you keep up week-by-week, the book would be $7.94 but if you wait a year, I’d bundle the book for the discounted price of $6.99 – sound fair? Again, I wouldn’t resort to this game plan unless I had no other option. After seeing some serial-esque publishing out there, I wanted to design a model for self-publishing authors to use.
Here’s the truth of the matter: libraries are expanding their print acquisitions, kids are reading more, and the world is growing more and more literate. On the other hand, the e-book market strutted forward. I neither believe that traditional publishing will die or that e-books will never earn critical acclaim. Instead, after noticing the traction short films keep grabbing, I approach this with temperance. Books will ear two kinds of acclaim: grossly popular and compressed critical. Because of this, one medium will continue to lead easily to the other. Charles Dickens and Georges Méliès may teach us yet again about how to sell entertainment as struggling artists without oppressing the public.

Loved this post, I have been busy lately, so I haven’t had the luxury to read this blog. I would disagree a bit with the idea that people discuss and reflect more now than in 1992. FAR less cellphone/texting use and no smartphones back then. I’m going to theorize that the people who discuss and reflect, still do so. Also that people who are of the personality type to discuss and reflect have been doing so even if they are only 15 years old.
Stephen King did a serial novel or two back in the ’90s and they did well…The Green Mile was one. I can’t remember if the one about the dragon was serialized. People like serials. For instance…Downton Abbey! Which, it may be argued (or reflected upon and discussed) is rather a posh soap! I adore DA it but…double reverse amnesia?!! Haw!
Yeah, maybe not. But maybe so as well. I certainly am, but we do that, don’t we? See something in ourselves and our friends and extrapolate that out into the world? I certainly see that with the indy/self-pub crowd. They think the market’s shifting that way just as much because THEY are. Maybe it is, maybe it isn’t, but I don’t think that’s a good enough reason. I’ll say “the jury’s out” on the reflection stuff.
Hall of the Dragon King? AWESOME start to a book. Good to know that those did well, and I’ll keep them in mind.
Double reverse amnesia? Wha? I remember the one… but that was just a con…
Ah ha, you are being specific to writers and their readers. I thought you were saying EVERYONE. Darn legal brain needs more qualifiers.
So, writers, readers and I suppose artiste types are discussing and reflecting more. I just remember lots of people discussing and reflecting throughout my whole life. I am actually doing a bit less recently which is confounding my friends and fiance to no end. Thought I would sit back and not opine on every little thing. Results: I listen to other people more, bite my toungue and (hee hee) I get asked my opinion rather than splashing it all about.
Yeah, I guess so… though I’m grateful for the mix up. It means that when I actually write about writing on here, it could be mixed up for a general article on everyday people. That’s one of my goals – wide open interaction with diverse people. So, in a strange way, I’m happy for the misunderstanding.
I suppose they are, but in general people are reading more as the copious links to the McSweeney’s articles show. “Reader” is a much broader term now than it was in the late eighties and nineties.
Yeah, I tend to bite my tongue more than in college. This has resulted in less restraining orders on my adversaries, haha. No seriously, that’s a good thing. The proverbs of Solomon say that even a fool is thought wise if he keeps his mouth closed.
Also, I know a few people who are self-publishing and making money! Cool, no? I would buy your book in serialized form, or whatever form you decide.
I know lots of people who are making money. In fact the argument’s shifting to this:
If you wanna make money, self-publish.
If you want notoriety, get an agent.
But of course that breaks down too. At the end of the day, I just want to share Gergia! I’m grateful for your support, sis, and am excited for the future. I’m on the step-outline of draft two, right now, for the record.
Any Oscar faves this year?? RANDOM!
Take Shelter. And it didn’t even get nominated.
Let me clarify, Take Shelter FOR EVERYTHING. Even my supporting actress was in this movie.
But among the nominees:
oh and “The Artist” out of principle.